Atkelar (atkelar) wrote,

WTF coding #5a - Specifications II

A few weeks ago, I wrote in this journal about my adventures with specs and standards. Well, I've added another algorithm to my crypto-library: SHA3... and oh my... they found an even more confusing way of expressing that than I've seen before. Here's the official NIST document about it... have a read if you dare. My personal enemy was Chapter 4 - "Sponge Construction" which is essentially very easy, but it is defined in a very, very, very lenghty way using letters as symbols for just about everything. No easy read IMHO.

This document does not leave open questions, but it's a "grasp all at once or none at all" case. Not really easy to read up on it because you go from one "huh?" to the next until you finally read all and read it again when you know all the forward-references...

Much to my surprise, the actual implementation worked like a charm, almost on the first try the test vecors were a match to my implementation.

On another note, I finally also implemented a random number generator, based on the "Fortuna" implementation. Works fine as well.
Tags: programming, standard, wtf

  • YouTube... or rather Google.

    Well, the most recent update in the TOS of YouTube did cause quite a stir, to the point that there are now petitions going around. And here's where I…

  • WTF: Graphics "design"

    This time: PDF and "graphics artists". Don't get me wrong, I do respect the amount of work that go into graphical artwork and design, not a problem…

  • WTF - Fitness Tracker

    Well... after resisting the urge for the longest time I finally caved and got myself one of these nifty fitness tracker wristbands. I stood in the…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 1 comment